BIOENERGY ‘94 Presented at the Sixth Natlonal Bioenergy Conference, Reno/Sparks, Nevada, October 2-6, 1994.
BIOENRGY PRODUCTION: INTEGRATING LIVESTOCK TREATMENT WITH BYPRODUCT DEVELOPMENT Nick C. Parker Texas Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit Texas Tech University Lubbock, TX 79409-212S | Clifford B. Fedler Department of Civil Engineering Texas Tech University Lubbock, TX 79409-1023 |
Pages 211-218
in Farrell, J., S. Sargent, D. Swanson, and R. Nelson (editors). 1994. Proceedings of the 6th National Bioenergy Conference, Vol. 1. Western Regional Biomass Energy Program. Department of Energy. Denver, Colorado.
'Sponsored by Texas Tech University, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, The Wildlife Management Institute, and the National Biological Survey
ABSTRACT An integrated demonstration lagoon system has been designed to treat waste from a 1000-head cattle confinement facility and an adjacent 180-sow swine facility operated by Texas Tech University. Methane gas, captured from a new design of an anaerobic lagoon, will be used as an energy source to dry grains and operate an electrical generator in the feedmill. Effluent from the first lagoon will be directed to a second pond for the production of microalgae. The final pond will be aerobic and used as a water source for production of bait and other nonfood-type fish. Data on production of gas, algal biomass and fish will be correlated with hydraulic and organic loading rates. This demonstration unit for nutrient extraction and reuse and the allied research is being supported with private, state and federal funds. All data and research will be available for public inspection.
INTRODUCTION
The oil embargo of 1974 stimulated interest in alternative fuel sources. The U.S. Congress supported development of alternative energy resource programs of which conversion of biomass to energy was a major component. Demonstration units and tax credits supported these programs and attempted to move the technology to the private sector. Adoption of the technology has been limited to site specific applications usually based on single industries. In addition, the returns of these alternative energy systems have been of limited economic scale because of the unfamiliarity of the technology, the low cost of traditional sources, and the less stringent regulations of the past. Growth of the human population with concurrent increases in animal production and a decrease of natural resources is driving development of more stringent state and federal environmental regulations. The challenge is to produce sufficient food for the world's population (Swaminathan 1992). This will require reuse of finite resources to increase value of all organic products and to recycle unused resources to minimize environmental degradation. The economic returns from alternative energy systems, including bioenergy, can be enhanced by the integration of industries. Waste products of one industry can become valuable resources in subsequent industries (Parker et al. 1992). For example, livestock and poultry waste can be anaerobically digested to produce bioenergy and a nutrient-rich effluent to be used for the production of aquacultural products, especially microalgae (Oswald 1988) and macrophytic plants. Effluents from the plant production systems can be used to produce various species of aquatic invertebrates and fish. Each of these serially related product streams generates economic return to support the overall project and minimize waste discharge. Alternative energy systems have been proven to be effective and feasible, but have not received wide-spread adoption. Adoption of integrated bioenergy technology has been impeded by lack of demonstration units and availability of adequate performance data. Constraints limiting adoption of these systems in the agriculture industry have included the lack of regulatory and financial incentives and the unavailability of demonstration sites showcasing this technology. The increasing focus of state and federal regulators on environmental issues and the growing pressure on environmental resources makes it timely to consider integrated waste management and energy production systems.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Department of Energy, through the Western Regional Biomass Energy Program has provided funding to establish an alternate energy production system integrated to produce aquaculture products and treat cattle and swine manure. This demonstration unit is located near New Deal, Texas at the Animal Science Burnett Center of Texas Tech University. The Burnett Center has a fully automated feedmill and facilities to handle 1000 head of cattle and a 180-sow farrow-to-finish swine production unit. Currently, the manure from cattle is collected by an automated scraper system located under the slotted floors of the pens. Manure from the swine unit is collected with a flush system, combined with the manure from the cattle and discharged into one of two settling basins. Effluent from the settling basins flows to a playa lake and then is used for on-site irrigation of farm crops, primarily cotton and sorghum. This treatment facility currently meets all requirements of regulatory agencies charged with maintaining environmental quality. Similar application of playa lakes to store and treat runoff from commercial cattle feedlots is a currently acceptable practice within the High Plains. The cattle feedlot industry of the High Plains usually maintains animals for about 5 months while they gain weight from an initial 200-400 kg (400-800 lb) to about 500 kg (1100 lb) at time of slaughter. In 1989, there were over 5 million head, 25% of the nation’s slaughtered cattle, shipped from feedlots in the Southern High Plains (Texas Agricultural Statistics Service 1989). Previous investigations have examined nutrient discharges and ground water infiltration from playa basins receiving runoff from cattle feedlots (Sweeten 1994, McReynolds 1994, and Stewart et al. 1994). Sweeten (1994) has reported that the low hydraulic conductivity in playa basins and effective sealing by solids essentially protects groundwater from nutrient contamination. Concentration of nitrate-nitrogen at depths greater than 6 feet beneath the playas was reported to be less than 3 mg/L. Other investigators have reported nitrate-nitrogen concentrations in the groundwater beneath playas to range from > 1 to 48 mg/L (McReynolds 1994; Fedler and Parker 1994). Although previous studies have reported only an insignificant level of groundwater infiltration beneath playas associated with feedlots, recent investigation of other playas indicate that these basins are significant areas of groundwater recharge (Mullican et al. 1994, Reddell 1994). The 4-stage demonstration treatment system will accept both swine and cattle waste that is screened to separate some of the heavy solid and fibrous materials. This system is an expansion of technology developed from an existing facility designed to culture marine microalgae using anaerobically-digested biomass from cattle feedlots (Fedler and Parker 1993). The demonstration pilot plant will consist of (1) the existing solid and liquid waste collection and fiber screening system, (2) an advanced facultative lagoon - a stratified digester with an aerobic surface and anaerobic bottom for digestion of the waste biomass, production of single-cell protein, and generation of methane gas, (3) ponds for the production of microalgae, duckweeds or macrophytes, and (4) a well-mixed lagoon for culture of finfish and storage of irrigation water (Figure 1). Water will pass sequentially from unit 1 through unit 4 and be recycled back to the swine and cattle operations as flush water or discharged as water for irrigation of crops. The advanced facultative lagoon contains an anaerobic pit with a minimum depth of 5 m (about 15 ft) into which the influent manure stream is discharged (Figure 2). The surrounding facultative pond of 2-3 m (6-10 ft) depth receives the overflow from the anaerobic pit. A barrier designed to restrict lateral flow of water from the pit surrounds the pit forcing water to flow up and over the barrier. The gas collection system sits above the barrier, but below the water surface. The water surface is free of mechanical obstructions and provides protection of the gas collection and piping systems. This subsurface placement of the gas collection system minimizes damage caused by wind, ice and vandalism.
POTENTIAL BENEFITS The design of this advanced facultative pond provides simple and economical collection of biogas to be used on site. In phase I of this project, we will quantify gas production. In phase II, we plan to install heating and electrical generation systems to utilize the gas on site. The major use of the biogas will be to heat grains in the flaking process of the on-site feedmill. This is the preferred and most efficient method of biogas utilization requiring minimal capital expenditures for equipment and no separation of water vapor and other noncombustibles in the gas stream. In areas where on-site utilization of biogas as a heat source is not seasonally attractive, conversion to electrical energy through use in internal combustion engines coupled to an electrical generator is the second best option.
FIGURE 1. Schematic of an integrated wastewater treatment system for livestock waste with three options for the third stage of the process (not to scale). Based on preliminary data, this project will have the potential to not only utilize animal waste to produce biogas and alleviate a major environmental problem, but to create a new industry with the production of single cell protein (microalgae and bacteria) and protein from aquatic plants (duckweed and macrophytes), which can be produced and used on location or exported. This protein source can be combined with corn, cottonseed, soybean meal or wheat by-products and processed into rations for fish,
FIGURE 2. Simplified schematic of the advanced facultative pond used in the integrated wastewater treatment system (not to scale) livestock, and poultry. Production of single cell protein and aquatic plant protein could provide new regional and nationwide markets for these commodities. Maximum annual production of marine microalgae is around 66 metric tons/ha (74 tons/A) on a dry weight basis annually. Typically, microalgae raised on the farm-scale produce between 2.7 and 16 metric tons/ha (3 and 18 tons/A) (Richmond 1986), indicating the need for improved efficiency in production. Taking an average production rate of 10.7 metric tons/ha (12 tons/A), nearly 1.8 million metric metric tons (2 million tons) of microalgae could be produced from the waste generated by the cattle produced on the Texas High Plains. If this algae (from 50 to 70% protein) were sold at a price compared to that of soya protein it would generate annual sales of approximately $240 million. Clearly, more economic value is possible when you consider that several high-valued products (Cohen 1986) can be extracted from the algae without reducing the value of the protein (Fedler et al. 1991). Duckweed, containing up to 45% protein, has been produced at about 30 metric tons (34 tons) (dry weight)/A and could serve as feed for cattle (Culley et al. 1981; Skillicorn et al. 1993). In addition to this potential new industry, other existing industries will be impacted through sales of the necessary equipment required to harvest and process the single cell protein (bacteria), microalgae, duckweed, and macrophytes into feeds and feed ingredients. Another potential revenue stream is from the production of water lilies, Louisiana irises, and other ornamental aquatic plants. This system is the most labor and capital intensive, however, it provides the greatest potential for economic return. Aquatic plants grown in the United States are now being shipped throughout the country and also to foreign markets, including Germany and Japan. Some of these ornamental plants are produced in open outdoor ponds, others in ponds covered with greenhouse structures. Selected individual plants have sold for $69.95 for a 10-15 cm (4-6 inch) pot. Returns for some ornamental plant crops grown in Texas have been as high as $80,000/A in one year. Of course the average return is much lower, but the potential for managing a nutrient reduction system as a business does exist. Production and sale of fish will generate additional funds. Bait fish commonly sell for $22-33/kg ($10-15/lb) and other high-value fish include fingerings of sport fish such as bass and bluegill; fingerlings of foodfish such as red drum and channel catfish to be stocked and reared in other facilities; and ornamental fish such as swordtails and mollies. Lower value fish, such as carp, can be processed as fish meal and incorporated into feeds for swine and poultry.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
In today's world, recycle and reuse are not only the politically correct words, they reflect the future. The rapidly growing global population is increasing both the demand and value of all natural resources. Although reuse of waste products is environmentally correct today, it will likely become mandatory in the near future. Producers within the agricultural industry who become knowledgeable of reuse options today position themselves for economic gain as discharge regulations become more stringent and reuse becomes mandatory. Those who voluntarily adopt reuse technology today will have an advantage over those who will be forced by regulators to adopt similar technology in the future. The development of technology to produce and use biogas for energy was intensively investigated in the United States following the oil embargo of 1974. The economics and regulatory pressure supporting implementation of this technology was not sufficient to maintain its adoption. The changing economic and regulatory environment of the 1990's will almost ensure adoption of reuse technology by the year 2000. As the number of farmers in the United States continues to decline and as large industry moves into agriculture production, the integration of industrial and farm operations is expected to increase. To remain competitive, independent farmers must adopt similar cost saving techniques. The demonstration project designed for the Texas Tech University animal science center at New Deal, Texas will provide the technology transfer necessary for producers to adopt integrated reuse processes, including energy from biomass.
REFERENCES
Cohen, Z. 1986. Products from microalgae. Pages 421-454 in Richmond, A. (Ed.) 1986. CRC handbook of microalgal mass culture. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida. Culley, D. D. Jr., E. Reimankova, J. Kuet, and J. B. Frye. 1981. Production, chemical quality and use of Duckweeds (
Lemnaceae) in aquaculture, waste management, and animal feeds. J.World Maricul. Soc., 12(2):27-49. Fedler, C. B. and N. C. Parker. 1993. High-Value Product Development Potential From Biomass. Paper No. 936056 presented at the International Summer Meeting of the ASAE/CSAE. Spolcane, Washington. June 2-23, 1993. Fedler, C.B. and N.C. Parker. 1994. Integrated waste treatment systems. Pages 209224 in L.V. Urban and A.W. Wyatt (eds) Proceedings of the Playa Basin Symposium, Texas Tech University Lubbock, Texas. Fedler, C. B., N. C. Parker, H. L. Schramm, Jr., and J. Borrelli. 1991. Integrated production of algal protein, omega-3 fatty acids, and fish in West Texas. Final Report to the U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration, Project No. 08-06-02714. Austin, Texas. McReynolds, D. 1994. Ground-water quality near selected South Plains feedlot operations. Pages 175-186 in L.V. Urban and A.W. Wyatt (eds) Proceedings of the Playa Basin Symposium, Texas Tech University Lubbock, Texas. Mullican, III, W.F., N.D. Johns, and A. Fryar. 1994. What a difference a plays lake can make: Defining recharge scenarios, rates, and contaminant transport to the Ogallala (High Plains) Aquifer. Pages 97-106 in L.V. Urban and A.W. Wyatt (eds) Proceedings of the Playa Basin Symposium, Texas Tech University Lubbock, Texas. Oswald, W. J. 1988. The role of microalgae in liquid waste treatment and reclamation. Pages 255-281 in Algae and Human Affairs. Cambridge University Press, Oxford. Parker, N. C., M. C. Bates and C. B. Fedler. 1992. Integrated aquaculture based on
Spirulina, livestock wastes, brine and power plant byproducts. Pages 369-372. In: J. Blake, J. Donald, and W. Magette, (eds) National Livestock, Poultry and Aquaculture Waste Management. American Society of Agricultural Engineers Publ. 03-92, St. Joseph, Michigan. Reddell, D.L. 1994. Multipurpose modification of playas - Studies from the 1960's. Pages 37-52 in L.V. Urban and A.W. Wyatt (eds) Proceedings of the Playa Basin Symposium, Texas Tech University Lubbock, Texas. Richmond, A. (Ed.). 1986. CRC handbook of microalgal mass culture. CRC Press, Boca Baton, Florida. Skillicorn, P., W. Spira, and W. Journey. 1993. Duckweed aquaculture: a new aquatic farming system for developing countnes. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, The World Bank. Washington, D.C. Sweeten, J.M. 1994. Water quality associated with plays basins receiving feedlot runoff. Pages 161-174 in L.V. Urban and A.W. Wyatt (eds) Proceedings of the Playa Basin Symposium, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas. Stewart, B.A., S.J. Smith, A.W. Sharpley, J.W. Naney, T. McDonald, M.G. Hickey, and J.M. Sweeten. 1994. Nitrate and other nutrients associated with playa storage of feedlot wastes. Pages 187-200 in L.V. Urban and A.W. Wyatt (eds) Proceedings of the Playa Basin Symposium, Texas Tech University Lubbock, Texas. Swaminathan, M. S. 1992. Cultivating food for a developing world. Environmental Sci. Technology, 26(6):1105-1107. Texas Agricultural Statistics Service. 1989. 1989 Texas Agricultural Statistics. Texas D;partrnent of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Agriculture. This page was last revised on Feburary 5, 1999.Comentário